<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private IP Address</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adywicaksono.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/private-ip-address/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adywicaksono.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/private-ip-address/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:41:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bogdan</title>
		<link>http://adywicaksono.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/private-ip-address/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adywicaksono.wordpress.com/2007/11/07/private-ip-address/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>The main idea of the IPv6 was to forget about NAT and give the ability for each device in the Net (PCs, mobile phones, tosters, etc) have their own IP. This IP will be reachable from anywhere, because it&#039;s &quot;real&quot; IP. Another idea was to reduce routing tables on core routers. It will be similar to phone numbering scheme - prefix defines the geographic position of the host. Currently 2 PC in the same room may have absolutely different IP addresses (if they got them from different ISPs) and this is really ugly :)
2 years ago I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mib.net.ua/2007/11/master-degree-work.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;master degree work&lt;/a&gt; about transition to IPv6 mechanisms (it&#039;s in ukrainian).  But after some analysing I found that there are a lot of unused (reserved in terms of IANA) IP addresses blocks. Just have a look on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IPv4 address space&lt;/a&gt;.  How could it be that a lot of engg &quot;cries&quot; about absence of IP addresses, when almost 30% of whole address space isn&#039;t used? :)
Probably that&#039;s the answer on question why we still use Private IP Address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main idea of the IPv6 was to forget about NAT and give the ability for each device in the Net (PCs, mobile phones, tosters, etc) have their own IP. This IP will be reachable from anywhere, because it&#8217;s &#8220;real&#8221; IP. Another idea was to reduce routing tables on core routers. It will be similar to phone numbering scheme &#8211; prefix defines the geographic position of the host. Currently 2 PC in the same room may have absolutely different IP addresses (if they got them from different ISPs) and this is really ugly <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
2 years ago I wrote <a href="http://www.mib.net.ua/2007/11/master-degree-work.html" rel="nofollow">master degree work</a> about transition to IPv6 mechanisms (it&#8217;s in ukrainian).  But after some analysing I found that there are a lot of unused (reserved in terms of IANA) IP addresses blocks. Just have a look on <a href="http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space" rel="nofollow">IPv4 address space</a>.  How could it be that a lot of engg &#8220;cries&#8221; about absence of IP addresses, when almost 30% of whole address space isn&#8217;t used? <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Probably that&#8217;s the answer on question why we still use Private IP Address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
